Anybody tried this WC 160 grain +P Barnes TAC-XP ammo?

lundi 2 mai 2016

Anybody tried this WC 160 grain +P Barnes TAC-XP ammo?



Curious if anyone has tried this ammo from Wilson Combat:

http://ift.tt/1Z2nDET

I love the Barnes stuff for carry in my 1911s and the 95 grain 9mm works very well in my Berettas. I am curious how this 160 grain +P .45 compares to the 185 grain standard velocity .45. More specifically I am interested in felt recoil comparisons. I currently carry the WC 185 grain Barnes TAC-XP in my GI NN CCO .45 and it has functioned 100%. Recoil is noticeably less than a 230 grain bullet. My thinking is that the 160 grain +P probably feels similar to the 185 grain standard velocity since it is a smaller bullet, but +P. Does that make sense? Anyone have first-hand experience with both of these loads?

The search for the best carry ammo continues..

Thanks all!

__________________
Wilson Combat: CQB LR .45, CQB .45, Beretta 92G Brigadier Tactical, Beretta 92G Compact Carry, Protector II Professional 9mm (on order).
Guncrafter Industries: No Name CCO .45, No Name Commander LR .45, M2 .45 (on order).
Nighthawk: Talon .45.

Reply With Quote

Let's block ads! (Why?)



Anybody tried this WC 160 grain +P Barnes TAC-XP ammo?

0 commentaires:

Enregistrer un commentaire

Copyright © 2010 Model 1911 | Free Blogger Templates by Splashy Templates | Layout by Atomic Website Templates